Hegemony and the concept of "Random Expressive Flow"

Considering the definition of hegemony given below, I could, reflexively, analyse the possible forms of hegemony that could frame the meaning of "Random Expressive Flow"

Conceptual (De Bono) -  Poetic/Intuitive (Poeisis/Heidegger) - Performative/Improvised(Delanda/Eshleman)

<------------------------------------------------Random Expressive Flow--------------------------------------------------->

I see 'Random Expressive Flow' as a possible simple inclusive access point to the creative commons of our planets evolutionary capacity.(c.f Deleuze bWo, morphogenic potential (Delanda)) I am not implying that Quality and Fit will inevitably emerge, just that the experiment, if it can be designed safely, should be done before we impose order based on assumptions(bad faith?c.f pragmatism) (Hogarth Hume) (1.)

Being such an open, inclusive concept, "Random Expressive Flow" offers the opportunity for the reader to select/project different meanings. It is possible certain ones will dominate, leading to a dominant discourse being generated around the concept...

For example 'Random Expressive Flow' could be assumed to be concerned  exclusively with introverted poetic intuition on one hand, or extroverted performance on the other, these could in turn be associated with  "irrelevance to rational debate"  (perhaps by a modernist) on one hand and "the potentially abusive"  (perhaps by a feminist) on the other...


It may perhaps also  be considered an enabler or a block to empathy...


Such interpretations may or may not have "validity",  depending on the context ( post structuralists would deny the refferential validity of  truth claims (Derrida)). The point is that discourse around the concept changes depending on the  perspectives/views taken..


However what  leads to the dominant discourse and what to the marginalised? How is the dominant discourse maintained? What "Truths" are claimed? (Foucault)


Compare: 
Derrida (Marginalised Discourse)
Foucault (Docile Bodies)
Habermas (Strategic & Communicative Discourse)
Giddens (Structuration/Reproduction of Structure)