Hegemony in the context of a concept of "Random Expressive Flow"?

Random Expressive Flow(c.f Stream of Conciousness(Ref)): Essentially a term I chose for its empowerment potential and width of application from concept to poetry to improvised performance. As a means of exploring self-organising potential...(Swimme+ Refs)




If we think in terms of  Hegemony ( Gramsci,Van Djik) :
It could become associated exclusively with Extrovert 'Bombastic Performance', or with Introverted Intuitive Poetic Exploration. It could be associated with "Becoming animal" Deleuze and hence a threat to social norms in a positive (Ref) and negative (Panoptican(Foucault)). It could be considered a dangerously 'anarchic' threatening concept opening up space for potential exploitation (eg feminist criticism of free art movements(Ref)).  ]


I am probably simplifying - I read a quote "Hegemony can only be  identified once a situation is closed, while it remains open there is nothing solid to be hegemonized"(ref)? is this true..if so there lies the boundrary between post marxism and post structuralism... the boundary that isn't a boundary, it rests on the issue of closure. (The process/assumption of closure being the essential focus?)