The foundation of this work: ideally a safe, peaceful transition to safe peaceful spaces for all, as informed and enabled by the wholeness, the coordination of things, the natural and intellectual capacities of all beings, acting safely for all.
Quotes
"Dialogue is mutual search for a new reality, not debate to win with stronger arguments. In a dialogue propositions are pointers toward a common new reality; not against each other to win a verbal battle, but complementing each other in an effort to accommodate legitimate goals of all parties, inspired by theories and values, and constructive-creative-concrete enough to become a causa finalis". Galtuung
"I use the concept of affect as away of talking about a margin of manouverability, the 'where we might be able to go' and 'what we might be able to do' in every present situation. I guess 'affect' is a word I use for 'hope': Massumi
"A discourse is a system of words, actions, rules, beliefs, and institutions that share common values. Particular discourses sustain particular worldviews. We might even think of a discourse as a worldview in action. Discourses tend to be invisible--taken for granted as part of the fabric of reality."Fairclough
Emergence is “the principle that entities exhibit properties which are meaningful only when attributed to the whole, not to its parts.” Checkland
"What the designer cares about is whether the user perceives that some action is possible (or in the case of perceived non-affordances, not possible)." Norman
Friday, 8 October 2010
Closure and Discourse Communities
If discourse analysis dismiss macro analysis for micro of discourse communities?
How do we decide the boundary of the discourse community?
What about its relevent environment?
(read Fairclough)
According to poststructural
Isn't such closure necessarily structural thinking which has supposedly been abandoned?
re Layder 233-236
No comments:
Post a Comment