The foundation of this work: ideally a safe, peaceful transition to safe peaceful spaces for all, as informed and enabled by the wholeness, the coordination of things, the natural and intellectual capacities of all beings, acting safely for all.
Quotes
"Dialogue is mutual search for a new reality, not debate to win with stronger arguments. In a dialogue propositions are pointers toward a common new reality; not against each other to win a verbal battle, but complementing each other in an effort to accommodate legitimate goals of all parties, inspired by theories and values, and constructive-creative-concrete enough to become a causa finalis". Galtuung
"I use the concept of affect as away of talking about a margin of manouverability, the 'where we might be able to go' and 'what we might be able to do' in every present situation. I guess 'affect' is a word I use for 'hope': Massumi
"A discourse is a system of words, actions, rules, beliefs, and institutions that share common values. Particular discourses sustain particular worldviews. We might even think of a discourse as a worldview in action. Discourses tend to be invisible--taken for granted as part of the fabric of reality."Fairclough
Emergence is “the principle that entities exhibit properties which are meaningful only when attributed to the whole, not to its parts.” Checkland
"What the designer cares about is whether the user perceives that some action is possible (or in the case of perceived non-affordances, not possible)." Norman
Thursday, 11 November 2010
Essay Positions
Pragmatism: Kelly (Expectation, Personal Construct Psychology) : Rep grid / Self Characterisation
Critical/Transformative: Habermas (System/lifeworld), Fairclough (Ideology), Butler (Performativity) and Deleuze (re Whole systems/Emergence)
Tool: (Critical Discourse Analysis/Critical Language Study)
Constructivism: Derrida- Deconstruction
(using Cresswell's Research Catagories (from reading list)
why? because each of the selected authors are difficult to place within the narrower catagories from the lecture series:
This lead however to a conflict size: 4000 words (I have 15000)
So I have to choose between those covered :
Positivism (No) ( has been replaced by post positivism)
Phenomenology (no) although Kelly has been placed here
Structuralism - (?) Kelly has been placed here
Post Structuralism ((YES) - Derrida, (Kelly is also considered a constructivist) - Deconstruction
Post Marxism (YES) - Habermas/Deleuze/Butler - Critical Discourse Analysis
I will state in my essay that I do not consider the catagory system/taxonomy an adequate set of catagories in which to place these authors...
to quote Derrida "can I say what is my position? I can say what I am stating now"
No comments:
Post a Comment