Coding:
(v.f re Assumed flat plane absolute categorization driven by instrumentality (links to feminist criticism? ask Catherine) re natural systems: complementary, self similar, no absolute boundary,
(metaphor of hands of body)
*the tendency towards classification via binary categories is an issue with potentially serious consequences in the context of fixing (arbitrary and profitable) oppositional subject positions...
Classification/coding can be 'object' based or functional...
i.e. can relate to human need or be an isolated depiction - e.g. it can be automated and uncurious replication or a conscious deliberation and discussion of function.(relates to Habermas Communicative Discourse)
One code should apply to only one category and categories should be comprehensive. There should be clear guidelines for coders (individual who do the coding) so that code is consistent.
Some studies will employ multiple coders working independently on the same date. This minimizes the chance of errors from coding and increases the
reliability of data.
For disciplines in which a
qualitative format is preferential, including
ethnography,
humanistic geography or
phenomenological psychology a varied approach to coding can be applied. Iain Hey (2005)
[citation needed] outlines a two step process beginning with basic coding in order to distinguish overall themes, followed by a more in depth, interpretive code in which more specific trends and patterns can be interpreted.
The process can be done manually, which can be as simple as highlighting different concepts with different colours, or fed into a software package. Qualitative software packages include for example
Atlas.ti, and
NVivo.
No comments:
Post a Comment