The language may be saying something, claiming to express what it knows, but it may also be doing something else with the claim that it makes, riding the wave of an aim that is known only in the effects it seeks to achieve, in an utterance from "the other scene," in the particular ways it attempts to modify the interlocutory situation at hand.
Butler
in
Felman, Shoshana. Scandal of the Speaking Body : Don Juan with J.L. Austin,
Palo Alto, CA, USA: Stanford University Press, 2002. p 120.
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ulincoln/Doc?id=10042908&ppg=142
shes talking about constructivist and representative ?
The performative, understood as illocutionary, indicates reality, even transforms it, as a matter of course; it seeks to modify a situation, to have certain effects. It therefore has this situation as its necessary, if not constitutive referent. (The phenomenological word "horizon" perhaps describes this better than "referent.") Indeed, the instituting act cannot be conceived without this indicating function.
in
Felman, Shoshana. Scandal of the Speaking Body : Don Juan with J.L. Austin,
Palo Alto, CA, USA: Stanford University Press, 2002. p 122.
A speech act is reducible neither to the body nor to a conscious intention, but becomes the site where the two diverge and intertwine. In this sense, the speaking body scandalizes metaphysics, in particular, its penchant for clear dichotomies:
If the problem of the human act thus consists in the relation between language and body, it is because the act is conceived— by performative analysis as well as by psychoanalysis— as that which problematizes at one and the same time the separation and the opposition between the two.The act, an enigmatic and problematic production of the
speaking body, destroys from its inception the metaphysical dichotomy between the domain of the "mental" and the domain of the "physical," breaks down the opposition between body and spirit, between matter and language, (p. 65)
Butler J Afterword
in
Felman, Shoshana. Scandal of the Speaking Body : Don Juan with J.L. Austin,
Palo Alto, CA, USA: Stanford University Press, 2002. p 123.
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ulincoln/Doc?id=10042908&ppg=145
No comments:
Post a Comment