Why if all views are relative settle on a negative meta-narrative of conflicting group interests...?
As it is no longer a referential choice....
Why not a simple inclusive non-sectarian common source of being...?Unless there is an interest in conflict? (conflict is profitable for many in many ways)"
on the other hand, yes there may be many dimensions, from the post modern perspective, but lets acknowledge it and notice with what we have replaced... it.
as Derrida said
"What costs humanity very dearly is doubtless to believe that one can have done in history with a general essence of Man, on the pretext that it represents only a Hauptgespenst,arch-ghost, but also, what comes down to the same thing, to still believe, no doubt, in this capital ghost. " Derrida
on the other hand, yes there may be many dimensions, from the post modern perspective, but lets acknowledge it and notice with what we have replaced... it.
as Derrida said
"What costs humanity very dearly is doubtless to believe that one can have done in history with a general essence of Man, on the pretext that it represents only a Hauptgespenst,arch-ghost, but also, what comes down to the same thing, to still believe, no doubt, in this capital ghost. " Derrida
No comments:
Post a Comment